Friendly fire

Contents

Friendly fire is inadvertent firing towards one's own or otherwise friendly forces while attempting to engage enemy forces, particularly where this results in injury or death. A death resulting from a negligent discharge is not considered friendly fire. Neither is murder, whether premeditated or in the heat of the moment, and nor is deliberate firing on one's own troops for disciplinary reasons, as in these cases there is no intent to harm the enemy.[1] Similarly, inadvertent harm to non-combatants or structures, usually referred to as "collateral damage" is also not considered to be friendly fire.[2]

The term friendly fire was originally adopted by the United States military. Many North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) militaries refer to these incidents as blue on blue, which derives from military exercises where NATO forces were identified by blue pennants, hence "blue", and Warsaw Pact forces were identified by orange pennants. Another term for such incidents is fratricide, a word that originally refers to the act of a person killing a brother.

Addressing friendly fire

Friendly fire is often seen as an inescapable result of combat. Attempts to reduce this effect by military leaders generally come down to identifying the causes of friendly fire and overcoming repetition of the incident through training, tactics and technology.

Causes

The primary cause of friendly fire is commonly known as the "fog of war" which attributes friendly fire incidents to the confusion inherent in warfare. Friendly fire that is the result of apparent recklessness or incompetence may fall into this category. The concept of a fog of war has come under considerable criticism, as it can be used as an excuse for poor planning, weak or compromised intelligence and incompetent command.

Fog of war incidents fall roughly into two classes:[1]

Errors of position
Where fire aimed at enemy forces accidentally ends up hitting one's own. Such incidents are exacerbated by close proximity of combatants and were relatively common during the First and Second World Wars, where troops fought in close combat and targeting was relatively inaccurate. As the accuracy of weapons improved, this class of incident has become less common but still occurs.
Errors of identification
Where friendly troops are mistakenly attacked in the belief that they are the enemy. Highly mobile battles, and battles involving troops from many nations are more likely to cause this kind of incident as evidenced by incidents in the first Gulf War, or the shooting down of a British aircraft by a U.S. Patriot battery during the Invasion of Iraq.[3] According to CNN, the best-known case of such an accident was the death of Pat Tillman in Afghanistan, although the exact circumstances of that incident are yet to be definitively determined.[4]

A number of situations can lead to or exacerbate the risk of friendly fire. Poor terrain and visibility are major factors. Soldiers fighting on unfamiliar ground can become disoriented more easily than on familiar terrain. The direction from which enemy fire comes may not be easy to identify, and poor weather conditions and combat stress may add to the confusion, especially if fire is exchanged. Accurate navigation and 'fire discipline' is vital.[5]

In high-risk situations, leaders need to ensure units are properly informed of the location of friendly units and to issue clear, unambiguous orders, but they must also react correctly to responses from soldiers who are capable of using their own judgement. Miscommunication can be deadly. Radios, field telephones, and signalling systems can be used to address the problem, but when these systems are used to co-ordinate multiple forces such as ground troops and aircraft, their breakdown can dramatically increase the risk of friendly fire. When allied troops are operating the situation is even more complex, especially with language barriers to overcome.[5]

Solutions

Training

Most militaries use extensive training to ensure troop safety as part of normal co-ordination and planning, but are not always exposed to possible friendly-fire situations to ensure they are aware of situations where the risk is high. Difficult terrain and bad weather can't be controlled, but soldiers must be trained to operate effectively in these conditions, as well as trained to fight at night. Such simulated training is now commonplace for soldiers worldwide. Avoiding friendly fire can be as straightforward as ensuring 'fire discipline' is instilled in troops, so that they fire and cease firing when they're told to. Firing ranges now also include 'Don't Fire' targets.[6]

The increasing sophistication of weaponry, and the tactics employed against American forces to deliberately confuse them has meant that while overall casualties have fallen for American soldiers in the late 20th and 21st centuries, the overall deaths due to friendly fire in American actions have risen dramatically. In the 1990 Gulf War, most of the Americans killed by their own forces were crew members of armored vehicles hit by anti-tank rounds. The response in training includes recognition training for Apache helicopter crews to help them distinguish American tanks and armored vehicles at night and in bad weather from those of the enemy. In addition, tank gunners must watch under fire in drills for "friendly" robotic tanks that pop out on training courses in California's Mojave Desert. They also study video footage to help them recognize American forces in battle more quickly. [7]

Technology

Improved technology to assist in identifying friendly forces is also an ongoing response to friendly fire problems. From the earliest days of warfare identification systems were visual and developed into extremely elaborate suits of armour with distinctive heraldic patterns. When radar was developed during World War II, IFF systems to identify aircraft developed into a multitude of radio beacons.

Correct navigation is vital to ensuring units know where they are in relation to their own force and the enemy. Efforts to provide accurate compasses inside metal boxes in tanks and trucks has proven difficult, with GPS a major breakthrough. Government contractors are rushing to perfect infra-red and carbon dioxide laser beacons that can be mounted on armored vehicles and that will identify themselves to their own forces.[7]

Other technological changes include hand-held navigational devices that use satellite signals, giving ground forces the exact location of enemy forces as well as their own. The use of infra-red lights and thermal tape that are invisible to observers without night-goggles, or fibres and dyes that reflect only specific wavelengths are still in their infancy, but may prove to be key identifiers for friendly infantry units at night.

There is also some development of remote sensors to detect enemy vehicles - the Remotely Monitored Battlefield Sensor System (REMBASS) uses a combination of acoustic, sesmic vibration, and infrared to not just detect, but identify vehicles. [6]

Tactics

Some tactics make friendly fire virtually inevitable, such as the practice of dropping barrages of mortars on enemy machine gun posts in the final moments before capture. This practice continued throughout the 20th century since machine guns were first used in World War I, and the high friendly fire risk has generally been accepted by troops since machine gun emplacements are tactically so valuable, and at the same time so dangerous that the attackers wanted them to be shelled, considering the shells far less deadly than the machine guns.[6] Tactical adjustments include the use of "kill boxes", or zones that are placed off-limits to ground forces while allied aircraft attack targets, which goes back to the beginning of military aircraft in World War I.[7]

The shock and awe battle tactics adopted by the American military - overwhelming power, battlefield awareness, dominant maneuvers, and spectacular displays of force - are employed because they are believed to be the best way to win a war quickly and decisively, reducing casualties on both sides. However, if the only people doing the shooting are American, then a high percentage of total casualties are bound to be the result of friendly fire, blunting the effectiveness of the shock and awe tactic. It is probably the fact that friendly fire has proven to be the only fundamental weakness of the tactics that has caused the American military to take significant steps to overturn a blasé attitude to friendly fire and assess ways to eliminate it.[6]

Historical examples

Wars of the Roses

Nine Years' War

American Revolutionary War

Napoleonic Wars

American Civil War

World War I

Spanish Civil War

World War II

1939

1940

1941

1942

1943

1944

1945

Korean War

On September 23, 1950, Hill 282 was attacked by 1st Battalion, Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders, part of the British 27th Brigade in the United Nations force. Having captured it and facing strong North Korean counter-attacks, the Argylls, devoid of artillery support, called in an allied air-strike. A group of F-51 Mustangs of U.S. Air Force's 18th Fighter Bomber Wing circled the hill. The Argylls had laid down yellow air-recognition panels correctly in accordance with that day's planning, but the North Koreans imitated similar panels on their own positions in white. The Mustangs, confused by the panels, mistakenly napalm-bombed and strafed the Argylls’ hill-top positions. Despite a desperate counter-attack by the Argylls to regain the hill, during which Major Kenny Muir was awarded a posthumous Victoria Cross, the Argylls, much reduced in numbers, were forced to relinquish the position. Over 60 of the Argylls’ casualties were caused by the friendly air-strike.

Six Day War

Vietnam War

8,000 such incidents have been estimated for the Vietnam War;[27][28][29] one was the inspiration for the book and film Friendly Fire.

Turkish Invasion of Cyprus 1974

Falklands War 1982

First Gulf War

War in Afghanistan

2003 invasion of Iraq

Gaza War

Other incidents

See also

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Regan, G. Backfire: a history of friendly fire from ancient warfare to the present day. Robson Books, 2002.
  2. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA468785&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
  3. The Economist Closing in on Baghdad March 25, 2003
  4. http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/07/01/afghan.probe/index.html U.S. military probes soldier's death.
  5. 5.0 5.1 no author given (no date given). "What is Friendly Fire?". wisegeek.com. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-friendly-fire.htm. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 http://books.google.com.au/books?id=uYxiz6P0KsEC&pg=PA4&lpg=PA4&dq=friendly+fire+technology&source=web&ots=_fu_xsiQJJ&sig=xSFG0xQBR0YutM6Yt8jnv0ytL40&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA78,M1
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 U.S. Striving to Prevent 'Friendly Fire' - New York Times
  8. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=MfSM14o6uqgC&pg=PA236&lpg=PA236&dq=friendly+fire+'world+war+I'&source=web&ots=_7Ejhh1Ugv&sig=V3pe3gjtPEoe689VukcBJN_aDwk&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result
  9. This figure comes from a 1921 book by an artillery expert, General Percin, called Le massacre de notre infanterie, 1914–1918. The book claims 75,000 French soldiers were casualties of their own artillery. Percin supports his claim with hundreds of battlefield correspondence from all parts of the Western Front.
  10. 10.00 10.01 10.02 10.03 10.04 10.05 10.06 10.07 10.08 10.09 10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 10.19 10.20 10.21 10.22 10.23 10.24 10.25 10.26 10.27 10.28 10.29 10.30 10.31 10.32 10.33 "Friendly Air to Air Kills. Blue on Blue incidents". World War II Forums. May 9, 2008. http://www.ww2f.com/weapons-wwii/22475-friendly-air-air-kills-blue-blue-incidents-2.html. Retrieved 9 Mar 2009.  This is a discussion forum. The entry, however, cites "Martin's book about Armée de l'Air losses (Ils etaient la); Gillet's books on French victoires (tome 1, 10–15 May; tome 2, 16 May – 4 June); AéroJournal no.3 (about Potez 631) and no.18 (about Aéronavale)"
  11. Operation Wikinger
  12. "O 10". Dutch submarines. 1997–2006. http://www.dutchsubmarines.com/boats/boat_o10.htm. Retrieved 10 Mar 2009. 
  13. Kennedy, Ludovic (1975). Pursuit, the Sinking of the Bismarck. London: Book Club Associates. pp. 153–154. 
  14. Channel 4 - History - Douglas Bader
  15. Daniel Ford, Flying Tigers: Claire Chennault and his American Volunteers, 1941–1942 (HarperCollins, 2006), pp. 203–4
  16. Hallion, Richard. Strike from the Sky: The History of Battlefield Air Attack, 1911–1945, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1989
  17. "Airborne Reinforcement". US Army in World War II. http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-MTO-Sicily/USA-MTO-Sicily-9.html. Retrieved 10 Mar 2009. 
  18. IKE An American Hero, Michael Korda,P509 ISBN 9780060756666
  19. HMS Sunfish, Uboat.net
  20. http://www.comandosupremo.com/Winter.html
  21. Viviano, Frank (13 July 2000). "Almost-Forgotten Heroes / Italian town honors black GIs who were shunned by their own country". The San Francisco Chronicle. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2000/07/13/MN77341.DTL. 
  22. 22.0 22.1 White-Harvey, Robert J. (April 18, 2007). "The Friendly Fires of Hell". Jerusalem Post.
  23. US Holocaust Museum Name Lists Catalogue
  24. Duncan, Gl. Maritime Disasters of World War II. p. 3, 1944 & 1945.
  25. Noel Till, Report on Investigations, WO 309/1592
  26. Arthur, Max (16 October 2000). "RAF pilots tricked into killing 10,000 camp survivors at end of war". The Independent (London). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/raf-pilots-tricked-into-killing-10000-camp-survivors-at-end-of-war-634445.html. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  27. "Accusations fly over lack of action on friendly fire deaths.". The Guardian. GlobalSecurity.org. 2003-04-08. http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/030408-friendlyfire01.htm. Retrieved 2009-01-19. 
  28. Bower, Amanda (2003-04-07). "Misfiring in the Fog.". Time. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1004597,00.html?promoid=googlep. Retrieved 2009-02-01. 
  29. Steinweg, K. K. (Spring 1995). "Dealing Realistically with Fratricide". Parameters. http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/parameters/1995/steinweg.htm. Retrieved 2009-02-01. 
  30. Royal Australian Navy Gun Plot HMAS Hobart Vietnam 1968
  31. Royal Australian Navy Gun Plot
  32. Argentine air forces in the Falklands War article
  33. Pablo Carballo article
  34. "U.S.: Friendly fire pilot reported being fired upon". CNN. 18 April 2002. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/04/18/afghanistan.canada/. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  35. Bruce Rolfsen, "F/A-18C Linked to British Marine's Death," Navy Times Online, 08 December 2006, accessed at http://www.navytimes.com/legacy/new/1-292925-2412022.php on 11 Jan 2007.
  36. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1038781/British-soldier-faces-manslaughter-charges-Afghanistan-friendly-deaths.html
  37. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070612/ap_on_re_as/afghan_violence
  38. Evans, Michael (19 December 2007). "Danish soldiers killed by British friendly fire". The Times (London). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3070875.ece. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  39. "British friendly fire kills Danes". The Guardian (London). 27 November 2007. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/nov/27/military.world. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  40. Friendly fire | Matthew Lyne-Pirkis | Grenadier guardsman | The Sun |HomePage|News
  41. Walker, Peter (21 December 2009). "Military police officer killed by British 'friendly fire' in Afghanistan". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/21/military-police-friendly-fire-death. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  42. "In pictures - The Iraq friendly fire incident". BBC News. 7 November 2003. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/photo_gallery/3244305.stm. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  43. http://www.aviationtoday.com/pressreleases/8587.html
  44. "US air strike kills Iraqi troops". BBC News. 9 February 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6346901.stm. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  45. "Calipari,video di Lozano al Tg5". Tgcom. 8 May 2007. http://www.tgcom.mediaset.it/mondo/articoli/articolo360981.shtml. Retrieved 24 June 2010. 
  46. "'Failings' behind death of marine". BBC News. 27 November 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/north_yorkshire/6187414.stm. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  47. "UK soldiers killed by 'friendly fire'". BBC News. 26 March 2003. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2886715.stm. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 

References

External links